Academic integrity
Show what the student checked and revised
Show what the student checked and revised works best when you separate your own contribution, the tool or source role and the checks completed before submission. This page provides a focused method, example and clear limitations.
Direct answer
Show what the student checked and revised comes down to two questions: was the assistance permitted for this assessment, and is its role described honestly? Course rules take priority over any detector score.
What to check
Turn the issue into observable checks. Each point should be confirmable in the brief, draft or original source before you edit.
- Assessment instructions
- Permitted or prohibited use
- Stages where AI was used
- Outputs accepted or rejected
- Human verification
Concrete example
Practical case: isolate the relevant passage, compare it with the brief and sources, then record one precise correction. Check 10 should leave a clear record of what was verified.
Why this case is specific
This page focuses only on “Show what the student checked and revised”. It turns one specific concern into concrete checks without replacing the module brief or marker’s judgement.
How SafeRender fits the workflow
SafeRender compares the brief, draft and sources to surface issues that deserve review. When AI was used, the goal is a coherent and transparent disclosure, not hiding the origin of content.
Limits and the rule that takes priority
Your institution, course and assignment instructions always take priority. Clear disclosure does not make prohibited use permitted, and no generic guide replaces written assessment rules.
Frequently asked questions
How can I check “Show what the student checked and revised” quickly?
Re-read the assignment instructions, isolate the relevant passage or source, apply the checks on this page and make one precise correction.
Does SafeRender guarantee that my work will be accepted?
No. SafeRender provides an indicative review. Your instructor, marker and institution remain the authorities on rules and final grading.
What if I used AI?
First check whether the use was permitted. If disclosure is required, state the tool, purpose, affected parts and human verification in factual terms.
Can I treat this page as the official rule?
No. Local institutional and assignment-specific rules always take priority.
Sources and resources
- AI use in summative assessment - University of Oxford (checked 2026-09-18)
Related pages
- Academic integrity
- Keep paraphrasing from becoming plagiarism
- Distinguish AI citation from AI-use disclosure
- Declare AI use in group coursework
- Compare AI use with module rules
- Respond to a tutor request about AI use
- Keep a useful audit trail of the writing process
- Check whether permitted AI use is properly declared
- Check your academic work before submission
Ready to check your document?
Add the prompt, draft and sources to get an indicative final review before submission.