Compare AI use with module rules

Direct answer

Compare AI use with module rules comes down to two questions: was the assistance permitted for this assessment, and is its role described honestly? Course rules take priority over any detector score.

What to check

Turn the issue into observable checks. Each point should be confirmable in the brief, draft or original source before you edit.

• Assessment instructions
• Permitted or prohibited use
• Stages where AI was used
• Outputs accepted or rejected
• Human verification

Concrete example

Practical case: isolate the relevant passage, compare it with the brief and sources, then record one precise correction. Check 14 should leave a clear record of what was verified.

Why this case is specific

This page focuses only on “Compare AI use with module rules”. It turns one specific concern into concrete checks without replacing the module brief or marker’s judgement.

How SafeRender fits the workflow

SafeRender compares the brief, draft and sources to surface issues that deserve review. When AI was used, the goal is a coherent and transparent disclosure, not hiding the origin of content.

Limits and the rule that takes priority

Your institution, course and assignment instructions always take priority. Clear disclosure does not make prohibited use permitted, and no generic guide replaces written assessment rules.