Marking criteria
Check your dissertation against the marking criteria
Turn broad marking criteria into visible checks across your dissertation draft.
The risk just before submission
Criteria such as critical analysis, coherence or methodology can be easy to read and hard to evidence in the actual draft.
What SafeRender checks
SafeRender compares the prompt, draft and sources so the remaining review work is visible before you submit.
- Criteria without clear evidence
- Criteria only partly addressed
- Sections that need stronger signposting
- Corrections to prioritise before submission
Example of a possible signal
Example: “The criterion mentions critical engagement, but the chapter mainly summarises sources.”
Three-step workflow
The workflow is kept short so you can spend the remaining time fixing the draft.
- Paste the criteria.
- Add the dissertation draft.
- Map weak criteria to sections you can revise.
Limits and institution rules
The report is indicative. SafeRender does not write the work, does not guarantee a mark, is not an AI detector and never overrides your university, tutor or lecturer guidance.
Document privacy
In demo mode, SafeRender extracts text for a limited analysis and does not store uploaded files as files. Account reports and service metadata are retained where needed to provide history, checkout access and paid features.
Frequently asked questions
Can it interpret my university rubric?
It can compare the wording you provide with the draft, but your university’s interpretation remains final.
Should I include the full rubric?
Yes, include as much of the marking criteria as you are allowed to use.
Ready to check your document?
Add the prompt, draft and sources to get an indicative final review before submission.