Marking criteria
How to use marking criteria before submission
Marking criteria only help if each criterion becomes visible evidence in the draft.
The risk just before submission
Students often read criteria as general advice instead of mapping each one to a specific paragraph or section.
What SafeRender checks
SafeRender compares the prompt, draft and sources so the remaining review work is visible before you submit.
- Convert criteria into questions
- Find evidence in the draft
- Mark partial coverage
- Revise the highest-risk criteria first
Example of a possible signal
Example: “critical engagement” requires more than summaries of sources.
Three-step workflow
The workflow is kept short so you can spend the remaining time fixing the draft.
- Paste criteria.
- Map evidence.
- Revise missing coverage.
Limits and institution rules
The report is indicative. SafeRender does not write the work, does not guarantee a mark, is not an AI detector and never overrides your university, tutor or lecturer guidance.
Document privacy
In demo mode, SafeRender extracts text for a limited analysis and does not store uploaded files as files. Account reports and service metadata are retained where needed to provide history, checkout access and paid features.
Frequently asked questions
Can criteria be subjective?
Yes, so tutor and module guidance remain final.
Can SafeRender use a rubric?
Yes, provide it as the brief or marking criteria.
Ready to check your document?
Add the prompt, draft and sources to get an indicative final review before submission.